Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? firefly@diku.dk (Peter Finderup Lund) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? firefly@diku.dk (Peter Finderup Lund) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? jplevyak@yahoo.com (John Plevyak) (2003-02-21) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? {spamtrap}@qeng-ho.org (Arthur Chance) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? alexc@std.com (Alex Colvin) (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? vbdis@aol.com (2003-02-24) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? firefly@diku.dk (Peter Finderup Lund) (2003-03-09) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-03-09) |
Re: When/why did function calls get cheap? klimas@klimas-consulting.com (Andreas Klimas) (2003-03-09) |
[6 later articles] |
From: | Arthur Chance <{spamtrap}@qeng-ho.org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Feb 2003 13:49:29 -0500 |
Organization: | Rare |
References: | 03-02-073 03-02-101 |
Keywords: | architecture |
Posted-Date: | 24 Feb 2003 13:49:29 EST |
Peter Finderup Lund <firefly@diku.dk> writes:
> The implementations of the ISAs has also improved: many provide an
> internal, hidden return stack so all calls and returns are correctly
> predicted (unless you try to play tricks and don't match them up).
Wouldn't this foul up continuation passing style compilation
techniques? Which ISAs do you have in mind?
--
2, 3, 3 & 37: the Prime Factors of the Beast.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.