Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-02-13) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? lars@bearnip.com (2003-02-13) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? dmr@bell-labs.com (Dennis Ritchie) (2003-02-21) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? christian.bau@cbau.freeserve.co.uk (Christian Bau) (2003-02-21) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? mgl8@attbi.com (Mike Ludwig) (2003-02-21) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? sander@haldjas.folklore.ee (Sander Vesik) (2003-02-21) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? andrew.higham@blueyonder.co.uk (Andrew) (2003-02-21) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-02-24) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-02-24) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt) (2003-02-24) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-02-24) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? marcov@stack.nl (2003-03-09) |
Re: "standard" C calling convention? mgl8@attbi.com (Mike Ludwig) (2003-03-09) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | "Andrew" <andrew.higham@blueyonder.co.uk> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 21 Feb 2003 00:47:13 -0500 |
Organization: | blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder) |
References: | 03-02-072 |
Keywords: | C, design |
Posted-Date: | 21 Feb 2003 00:47:13 EST |
"Peter Seibel" <peter@javamonkey.com> wrote in message
> People often refer to the "standard C calling convention", usually as
> opposed to some other calling convention that a compiler also
> supports. ...
As the moderator pointed out the Unix ABIs define standard calling
conventions. The ix86 abi is at
http://www.sco.com/developers/devspecs/abi386-4.pdf. Chapter 3
describes the calling conventions. This is a de-jure standard for
SVR4 Unix, but I think it is pretty compatible with the de-facto
standard on other OSes running ix86.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.