Related articles |
---|
help understand Waite & Goos rmichalski@era.pl (Rafal Michalski) (2003-01-12) |
Re: help understand Waite & Goos juergen@informatik-vollmer.de (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dr=2E_J=FCrgen_Vollmer?=) (2003-01-21) |
From: | "Rafal Michalski" <rmichalski@era.pl> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 12 Jan 2003 17:59:29 -0500 |
Organization: | TORMAN |
Keywords: | books, question |
Posted-Date: | 12 Jan 2003 17:59:29 EST |
Need some help to understand Waite and Goos "Compiler Construction"
formalism. Obviously these may be lamer's questions of computer
science - is there more suitable group? - but from mathematician's
point of view, things go unclear at EBNF introduction in 5.1.4.
First, it appears to me in Fig. 5.8
as if the set T was the sum of the following sets:
- set of identifiers
- set of literals
- {is, or, lpn, rpn, lbk, rbk, plus, star, period, separator}
instead of being sum of sets
- {identifier} (one-element set)
- {literal} (one-element set)
- {is, or, lpn, rpn, lbk, rbk, plus, star, period, separator}
?
Second, what is "set of unique identifiers", how it can be disjoint
from the set of identifiers an literals appearing in the
specification? Please help me see both sets L, I in Fig. 5.8c.
Greats
Rafal Michalski
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.