Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Overlapping live ranges in Open64's SSA form dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2002-12-19) |
| Re: Overlapping live ranges in Open64's SSA form lsjoberg@aland.net (2002-12-22) |
| Re: Overlapping live ranges in Open64's SSA form dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2002-12-24) |
| From: | lsjoberg@aland.net (Linus =?iso-8859-1?q?Sj=F6berg?=) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 22 Dec 2002 10:39:32 -0500 |
| Organization: | Alcom |
| References: | 02-12-102 |
| Keywords: | analysis, optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 22 Dec 2002 10:39:32 EST |
Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:
> Furthermore, what would happen to the '&' operator in C? Say we
> take the address of variable 'a' that has two live versions.
> Which one do we use?
Have you looked at:
Christopher Lapkowski, Laurie. J. Hendren "Extended SSA Numbering:
Introducing SSA properties to languages with multi-level pointers"
That paper discusses this problems; I used it to get around the
pointer/dereferencing problem in my own Master's thesis.
/LS
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.