Related articles |
---|
[31 earlier articles] |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) (2002-11-24) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" cgweav@aol.com (Clayton Weaver) (2002-11-24) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-11-24) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-11-24) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" ajo@andrew.cmu.edu (Arthur J. O'Dwyer) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" Nicola.Musatti@ObjectWay.it (Nicola Musatti) (2002-11-26) |
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (Nick Maclaren) (2002-11-26) |
[29 later articles] |
From: | "jacob navia" <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Nov 2002 21:49:33 -0500 |
Organization: | Wanadoo, l'internet avec France Telecom |
References: | 02-11-059 02-11-071 02-11-122 |
Keywords: | C, types |
Posted-Date: | 26 Nov 2002 21:49:33 EST |
> If you mean that programs written using inferred types are less
> reliable than programs written in languages that require explicit
> declarations, I don't agree either. In my experience, the lack of
> distinction in C between booleans and integers ...[snip]
C99 specifies the boolean type.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.