Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?"

"Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
24 Nov 2002 18:37:08 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[27 earlier articles]
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" whopkins@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" cgweav@aol.com (Clayton Weaver) (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-11-24)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2002-11-26)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2002-11-26)
Re: Pointers to "why C behaves like that ?" ajo@andrew.cmu.edu (Arthur J. O'Dwyer) (2002-11-26)
[33 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Nov 2002 18:37:08 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 02-11-059 02-11-087 02-11-089 02-11-111 02-11-126
Keywords: types, design
Posted-Date: 24 Nov 2002 18:37:08 EST

+ [I don't see a useful difference between a system that requires that you
+ declare everything, vs. one that doesn't but produces undeclared variable
+ warnings that the programmer treats like error messages. -John]


thp@cs.ucr.edu wrote:
> Some of my students are Pythonistas. They insist that the lack of
> such assistance from the compiler in detecting typos has never been an
> issue. (I wouldn't know.)


Do these students have *serious* programming experience? Are their
programs large enough that long variable/function/module names make
sense? If the answer to either question is "no", I'd consider their
experience to be unrelated to everyday practice ;-)


Regards,
Joachim


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.