Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating t joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-09-22) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2002-09-25) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generati clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2002-09-29) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with genera joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-10-13) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating tok lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2002-10-18) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating t joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-10-20) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating lars@bearnip.com (Lars Duening) (2002-10-25) |
| Re: What should be check in Lexical Analyzer along with generating lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2002-10-25) |
| From: | "Lars Duening" <lars@bearnip.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 25 Oct 2002 00:01:09 -0400 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 02-09-087 02-09-110 02-09-121 02-09-128 02-09-141 02-09-156 02-10-010 02-10-056 02-10-095 |
| Keywords: | lex |
| Posted-Date: | 25 Oct 2002 00:01:08 EDT |
Joachim Durchholz <joachim_d@gmx.de> wrote:
> Basically, it depends on the questions what's the contents of a comment:
> is it a sequence of characters, or a sequence of tokens? That's
> something that should be found in the language definition.
Which is the crucial point. Myself, I would expect
/* parse "this */ 10 /* and this" */
to be compiled as
comment 'parse "this'
number 10
comment 'and this"'
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.