Related articles |
---|
Type 1 in Finite Space grammar possible? qjackson@shaw.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2002-09-03) |
From: | "Quinn Tyler Jackson" <qjackson@shaw.ca> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Sep 2002 00:28:50 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Posted-Date: | 03 Sep 2002 00:28:50 EDT |
The language $:
(A[n] x is a[n] y.)+ Is a[n] x-sub-n a[n] y-sub-n?
Example:
"A dog is an animal. A car is a vehicle. A computer is a machine. Is a
car a vehicle?"
But not:
"A dog is an animal. A car is a vehicle. A computer is a machine. Is a
computer an animal?"
(Note that the final question is only accepted if the x-y pair correlates.)
The question:
Can a finitely large Type 1 Chomsky form grammar be constructed that
accepts the language $? (It must be entirely expressible by the
grammar, not by external ad hockery.)
--
Quinn Tyler Jackson
http://members.shaw.ca/qjackson/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.