From: | "Tzvetan Mikov" <ceco@jupiter.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 23 Aug 2002 11:04:52 -0400 |
Organization: | Concentric Internet Services |
References: | 02-07-098 02-07-121 02-07-128 02-08-005 02-08-024 02-08-054 |
Keywords: | performance |
Posted-Date: | 23 Aug 2002 11:04:52 EDT |
"Marco van de Voort" <marcov@toad.stack.nl> wrote in message
> Tzvetan Mikov wrote:
>> [... that Borland C/Delphi optimizer is not very good]
>
> But how did the overal performance differ?
>[...]
I have made some CPU-intensive comparisons between Windows compilers
and in each case Borland C invariably came out at least 20% slower
than Visual C or GCC. This is a very substancial difference in the
context of comp.compilers, I think.
In the context of real-world Windows programming and the typical
applications that are developed with Delphi (GUI and database
frontends?) such performance difference couldn't matter less... :-)
-tzvetan
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.