Related articles |
---|
Finding the set of recursive calls jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2002-07-21) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls dietz@dls.net (Paul F. Dietz) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls Martin.Ward@durham.ac.uk (Martin Ward) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2002-07-25) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-07-31) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2002-08-04) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-08-10) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-08-10) |
Re: Finding the set of recursive calls haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2002-08-14) |
From: | "Hans Aberg" <haberg@matematik.su.se> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 Aug 2002 11:39:24 -0400 |
Organization: | Mathematics |
References: | 02-07-090 02-07-133 |
Keywords: | analysis |
Posted-Date: | 04 Aug 2002 11:39:24 EDT |
"VBDis" <vbdis@aol.com> wrote:
>>Possibly, you need a version for a undirected graph.
>
>Isn't in an undirected graph any node recursive, which has at least
>one edge attached? Follow that edge forth and back again...
In a directed graph, the equivalence relation used to define strongly
connected components is that there are paths both ways between vertices.
In an undirected graph, then this just reduces to being a connected
component, as one always can travel both ways.
So in an undirected graph, Tarjan's algorithm (if hooked up this way)
merely produces the connected components .
Hans Aberg * Anti-spam: remove "remove." from email address.
* Email: Hans Aberg <remove.haberg@member.ams.org>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.