Related articles |
---|
Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-21) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases wilson@redhat.com (Jim Wilson) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases felixundduni@freenet.de (felix) (2002-07-24) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-25) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-25) |
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases David.Mosberger@acm.org (David Mosberger-Tang) (2002-07-31) |
From: | "felix" <felixundduni@freenet.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Jul 2002 02:27:01 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 02-07-066 |
Keywords: | optimize, C |
Posted-Date: | 24 Jul 2002 02:27:01 EDT |
Andreas Bauer wrote:
>
> I'm currently putting some work into trying to eliminate tail-calls in
> gcc. My main focus is to enhance the compilation of GHC's intermediate
> C-code in order to improve the usability and performance of Haskell
> programs in general.
In case you haven't read it already, the following paper
is quite interesting:
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/~schani/diplarb.ps
cheers,
felix
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.