Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases

"Jim Wilson" <wilson@redhat.com>
24 Jul 2002 02:22:38 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-21)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2002-07-24)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2002-07-24)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases wilson@redhat.com (Jim Wilson) (2002-07-24)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases felixundduni@freenet.de (felix) (2002-07-24)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-25)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases baueran@in.tum.de (Andreas Bauer) (2002-07-25)
Re: Tail-Call Elimination Use-Cases David.Mosberger@acm.org (David Mosberger-Tang) (2002-07-31)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Jim Wilson" <wilson@redhat.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Jul 2002 02:22:38 -0400
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: 02-07-066
Keywords: C, optimize
Posted-Date: 24 Jul 2002 02:22:37 EDT

"Andreas Bauer" <baueran@in.tum.de> writes:


> I'm currently putting some work into trying to eliminate tail-calls in
> gcc.


gcc 3 has new tail call and sibling call optimizations, and they are working
fairly well. Further improvements are possible, but that is a matter of
finding volunteers interested in working on this part of GCC.


Jim

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.