Related articles |
---|
[5 earlier articles] |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C cdg@nullstone.com (Christopher Glaeser) (2002-06-17) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C wasowski@data.pl (Andrzej Wasowski) (2002-06-20) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C wasowski@data.pl (Andrzej Wasowski) (2002-06-20) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C wasowski@data.pl (Andrzej Wasowski) (2002-06-20) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C mlacey@microsoft.com (Mark Lacey \[MSFT\]) (2002-06-20) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2002-06-28) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C snicol@apk.net (Scott Nicol) (2002-06-28) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C haberg@matematik.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2002-06-28) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C ralph@inputplus.co.uk (Ralph Corderoy) (2002-06-28) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C iddw@hotmail.com (Dave Hansen) (2002-06-28) |
Re: Optimizing empty functions in C Peter-Lawrence.Montgomery@cwi.nl (Peter L. Montgomery) (2002-06-28) |
From: | "Scott Nicol" <snicol@apk.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 28 Jun 2002 18:06:22 -0400 |
Organization: | APK Net |
References: | 02-06-025 02-06-037 02-06-061 |
Keywords: | C, optimize |
Posted-Date: | 28 Jun 2002 18:06:22 EDT |
"Andrzej Wasowski" <wasowski@data.pl> wrote in message
> > The only way to figure out what works best is to write some test code
> > and try it on potential target compilers.
> Thanks for the reply. The problem is I target embedded systems
> compilers mostly. This also means that I have no way to try this out
> and I am asking for common experience here.
The answer remains the same. It's mostly the processor. On some
processors, calls are cheap. On others, calls are expensive. If I
were generating code that could be targetted at any processor, I'd put
in the if (flag) because at best it is a big win, and at worst it is a
small loss.
--
Scott Nicol
snicol@apk.net
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.