Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars

kgw-news@stiscan.com
20 Jun 2002 21:45:01 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compiler books for beginners? bart@dynarec.com (2002-05-27)
Re: Compiler books for beginners? rboland@unb.ca (Ralph Boland) (2002-05-27)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars parsersinc@yahoo.com (SLK Parsers) (2002-06-13)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2002-06-14)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars rboland@unb.ca (Ralph Boland) (2002-06-17)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2002-06-17)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars kgw-news@stiscan.com (2002-06-20)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars kgw-news@stiscan.com (2002-06-28)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars parsersinc@yahoo.com (SLK Parsers) (2002-06-28)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars parsersinc@yahoo.com (SLK Parsers) (2002-06-28)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars soenke.kannapinn@wincor-nixdorf.com (=?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Kannapinn?=) (2002-06-28)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2002-07-02)
Re: regular expression operators in CF grammars cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2002-07-02)
[12 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: kgw-news@stiscan.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 20 Jun 2002 21:45:01 -0400
Organization: Solution Technology
References: 02-05-142 02-05-151 02-06-024 02-06-044 02-06-054
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 20 Jun 2002 21:45:00 EDT

On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 04:12:39 UTC, "Ralph Boland" <rboland@unb.ca>
wrote:


> Meanwhile if there are other regular expression operators that are
> useful for parsing I would be interested in knowing; I will consider
> implementing them.
>


Try looking at the Algol68 meta-productions to see if there
are any other ideas. But I think you have the main ones.
? covers -ETY
^ covers -LIST, -TRAIN etc.
+ covers -SEQUENCE(?)


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.