Re: C Compiler in C++

loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (Martin v. =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6wis?=)
12 May 2002 00:02:22 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
C Compiler in C++ stanarevic@hotmail.com (2002-05-08)
Re: C Compiler in C++ loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (2002-05-12)
Re: C Compiler in C++ dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2002-05-12)
Re: C Compiler in C++ journeyman@compilerguru.com (2002-05-12)
Re: C Compiler in C++ thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-05-12)
Re: C Compiler in C++ rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2002-05-13)
Re: C Compiler in C++ lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2002-05-13)
Re: C Compiler in C++ alexc@world.std.com (2002-05-17)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (Martin v. =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6wis?=)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 May 2002 00:02:22 -0400
Organization: Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Computer Science
References: 02-05-039
Keywords: C, symbols
Posted-Date: 12 May 2002 00:02:22 EDT

stanarevic@hotmail.com (Nemanja Stanarevic) writes:


> Does anyone know of a good way (or generally accepted way) of
> representing the parse tree for C declarations using a similar class
> hierarchy?


I think your approach is quite reasonable, and I know that atleast gcc
takes the same approach - you first have to collect declspec,
declarator, etc, and only then can find out what kind of declaration
you got.


Regards,
Martin

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.