Related articles |
---|
Catastrophic compiler errors mlacey@microsoft.com (Mark Lacey \[MSFT\]) (2002-04-06) |
Re: Catastrophic compiler errors journeyman@compilerguru.com (2002-04-07) |
Re: Catastrophic compiler errors nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2002-04-10) |
Re: Catastrophic compiler errors avergison@skynet.be (Andre Vergison) (2002-04-10) |
Re: Catastrophic compiler errors shankarunni@earthlink.net (Shankar Unni) (2002-04-13) |
Re: Catastrophic compiler errors joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-04-16) |
From: | journeyman@compilerguru.com (journeyman) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 7 Apr 2002 22:43:51 -0400 |
Organization: | Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing |
References: | 02-04-035 |
Keywords: | errors, practice |
Posted-Date: | 07 Apr 2002 22:43:50 EDT |
On 6 Apr 2002 23:40:24 -0500, Mark Lacey \[MSFT\] <mlacey@microsoft.com> wrote:
>I'm wondering if anybody can point me to any information regarding cases
>where buggy compilers (in particular buggy optimizers & code generators)
>caused a catastrophic failure of some kind.
Nothing revealed on a quick browse of Peter G. Neumann's summary:
http://www.csl.sri.com/users/neumann/illustrative.html
If anything as visible as the kind of examples listed ever happened,
I'm certain it would have shown up on comp.risks. Of course, there's
always a first time...
Morris
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.