Related articles |
---|
Grammar with precedence rules haberg@matematik.su.se (2002-03-09) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-03-11) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules haberg@matematik.su.se (2002-03-17) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules mickunas@cs.uiuc.edu (Dennis Mickunas) (2002-03-17) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-03-19) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules haberg@matematik.su.se (2002-03-21) |
Re: Grammar with precedence rules michaeldyck@shaw.ca (Michael Dyck) (2002-03-31) |
From: | Joachim Durchholz <joachim_d@gmx.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 19 Mar 2002 16:10:20 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 02-03-043 02-03-068 02-03-077 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 19 Mar 2002 16:10:20 EST |
Hans Aberg wrote:
> Right, this not what I want:
Hmm... I must confess that I didn't fully understand what you're trying
to achieve.
One thing that could be done is to use a Tomita (Earley) parser and use
the priorities to resolve any ambiguities. (Never having used such a
parser, I can't say whether the parser will give you the information you
need to trace the ambiguity to a rule though.)
BTW I'm not sure whether it's a good idea. Prioritizing stuff means that
you'll never see any unintentional ambiguities. And to make sure that
there are no unwanted ambiguities left, you'll have to thoroughly
understand the grammar, so you'll have to do it the hard way anyway.
Or did I overlook something?
> The book http://www.cs.vu.nl/~dick/PTAPG.htm
That link won't work, anybody interested in the book please try
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~dick/PTAPG.html (the l was missing on the file suffix).
Regards,
Joachim
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.