Related articles |
---|
Incremental lexer implementation chenderson@iname.com (2002-02-28) |
Re: Incremental lexer implementation idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira D. Baxter) (2002-03-09) |
Re: Incremental lexer implementation maratb@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Marat Boshernitsan) (2002-03-09) |
Re: Incremental lexer implementation idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira D. Baxter) (2002-03-11) |
From: | "Ira D. Baxter" <idbaxter@semdesigns.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 11 Mar 2002 02:16:46 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 02-02-076 02-03-007 |
Keywords: | lex |
Posted-Date: | 11 Mar 2002 02:16:46 EST |
I stand corrected. Apparantly there *is* a chapter on incremental
lexing in his thesis.
In my reading of that thesis N odd years ago, I was so focused on the
incremental parsing part, that I'm sure I read it and forgot about it.
Wagner's thesis really is interesting if you are a fan of parsing
technology.
My apologies for any confusion I've added.
--
Ira D. Baxter, Ph.D. CTO Semantic Designs, Inc.
http://www.semdesigns.com
"Ira D. Baxter" <idbaxter@semdesigns.com> wrote in message
> Incremental Lexer? No, he describes an incremental parser based on
> Tomita (GLR) parsing technology.
> "gcc_learner" <chenderson@iname.com> wrote in message
> > In his Ph.D. thesis, Tim Wagner descibres an incremental lexer by
> > driving a batch lexer. Has anybody published an implementation of the
> > algorithms Wagner decribes?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.