Related articles |
---|
parsing non-XML to DOM -- "XML without all the angle brackets" robert_dodier@yahoo.com (2002-03-09) |
Re: parsing non-XML to DOM -- "XML without all the angle brackets" syring@email.com (Karl M. Syring) (2002-03-11) |
Re: parsing non-XML to DOM -- "XML without all the angle brackets" joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-03-11) |
From: | robert_dodier@yahoo.com (Robert Dodier) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 Mar 2002 02:51:26 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com/ |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Posted-Date: | 09 Mar 2002 02:51:26 EST |
Hello,
I have an idea that goes like this. XML has lots of advantages,
but human comprehensibility isn't one of them. It seems to me
that XML would be a lot more comprehensible if we just drop
the angle brackets and redundant stuff -- to have
toptag nextlevel { stillmore bottom1 "hello" yetagain "world" }
as opposed to
<toptag><nextlevel><stillmore><bottom1>hello</bottom1>
<yetagain>world</yetagain></stillmore></nextlevel></toptag>
I would like to still use a DTD to state the grammar, and I'd
like to parse stuff into a DOM -- that's handy for programs
to work with, so let's keep it.
What is a good way to approach this problem?
For what it's worth, I've trotted this out over on comp.text.xml
and didn't get any helpful responses.
I've worked with XML a fair bit over the last couple of years,
and I took a compiler class in 1984, so that's my background on this.
Thanks for your comments --
Robert Dodier
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.