Related articles |
---|
Processor specific optimisations mpointie@eden-studios.fr (Mickaël Pointier) (2002-01-17) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations pfroehli@ics.uci.edu (Peter H. Froehlich) (2002-01-18) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations dave@cyclicode.net (Dave Hudson) (2002-01-18) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-18) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations usenet@gehre.org (2002-01-18) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2002-01-24) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations jgd@cix.co.uk (2002-01-24) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations thp@cs.ucr.edu (2002-01-24) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations RLWatkins@CompuServe.Com (R. L. Watkins) (2002-01-24) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations mpointie@eden-studios.fr (Mickaël Pointier) (2002-01-28) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-28) |
Re: Processor specific optimisations mpointie@eden-studios.fr (Mickaël Pointier) (2002-01-30) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Jan 2002 13:45:55 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 02-01-077 02-01-084 |
Keywords: | optimize, comment |
Posted-Date: | 24 Jan 2002 13:45:55 EST |
Dave Hudson wrote:
> Sadly, most 8-bit compilers I've encountered have produced at best
> average and usually quite bad code. I think that part of the problem
> with these though is that many of them haven't don't support all of
> the higher-level optimizations that you'd find in say gcc.
Actually gcc does a rather bad job of generating code for 8 bit
processors when compared to many of the 8 bit compilers currently
available. gcc after 20 years or so just does not represent the
current art of compiler implementation.
w..
[GCC does a pretty good job on 32 bit machines with plenty of registers,
but I don't think anyone ever expected it to target 8-bitters. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.