Related articles |
---|
a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-07) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable RLWatkins@CompuServe.Com (R. L. Watkins) (2002-01-13) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-17) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable RLWatkins@CompuServe.Com (R. L. Watkins) (2002-01-24) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-28) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable rickh@capaccess.org (2002-01-28) |
Re: a compembler for x86 that looks nearly portable david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2002-02-06) |
From: | "R. L. Watkins" <RLWatkins@CompuServe.Com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 13 Jan 2002 22:52:39 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 02-01-038 |
Keywords: | 386, assembler |
Posted-Date: | 13 Jan 2002 22:52:39 EST |
1) Interesting. Sounds a bit like 'B' w/ built-in system calls.
2) This point is too important to be left buried at the end of a long post.
Everyone, in particular my own colleagues, repeat this to yourself until it
sinks in.
R. L. Watkins
> osimplay, formerly shasm, is an x86 macro-assembler, "mid-level-language",
or "compembler". It is implemented entirely in GNU Bash 2 without dependance
on any external utils.
> <snip>
> Bad names don't matter to machines, but frequently cause humans to write
dysfunctional, often totally self-extraneous code, and this effect is
self-compounding, and I believe people don't appreciate how bad the
situation is.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.