Related articles |
---|
new language syntax aberegov@home.com (Aleksey Beregov) (2001-08-24) |
Re: new language syntax remove.haberg@matematik.su.se (2001-08-25) |
Re: new language syntax 04lzvud73001@sneakemail.com (2001-08-25) |
Re: new language syntax svdh@wanadoo.fr (2001-09-21) |
Re: new language syntax howard.s.modell@boeing.com (HSM) (2001-09-25) |
Re: new language syntax rboland@unb.ca (Ralph Boland) (2001-09-26) |
Re: new language syntax joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-10-06) |
Re: new language syntax wclodius@aol.com (2001-10-20) |
Re: new language syntax cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2001-11-05) |
From: | svdh@wanadoo.fr (steve) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 21 Sep 2001 23:42:21 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com/ |
References: | 01-08-138 01-08-144 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 21 Sep 2001 23:42:20 EDT |
04lzvud73001@sneakemail.com (Tim Olson) wrote in message news:01-08-144...
> "Aleksey Beregov" <aberegov@home.com> wrote:
>
> | I am developing the syntax for a language which should [must] be very
> | suitable for working with sets, collections and other aggregate types.
APL was designed for it.
Scheme macros and higher order programming are also a nice solution
[APL was certainly designed for arrays, but you have to do sets,
collections &c yourself -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.