Re: Object Module Formats

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
11 Sep 2001 00:25:29 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Object Module Formats old_dnepr@yahoo.com (2001-09-05)
Re: Object Module Formats dlindauer@notifier-is.net (david lindauer) (2001-09-11)
Re: Object Module Formats p_carroll@yahoo.com (Paul Carroll) (2001-09-11)
Re: Object Module Formats vbdis@aol.com (2001-09-11)
Re: Object Module Formats aarongray@beeb.net (Aaron Gray) (2001-09-11)
Re: Object Module Formats old_dnepr@yahoo.com (2001-09-16)
Re: Object Module Formats dlindauer@notifier-is.net (david lindauer) (2001-09-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 11 Sep 2001 00:25:29 -0400
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 01-09-019
Keywords: linker, comment
Posted-Date: 11 Sep 2001 00:25:29 EDT

old_dnepr@yahoo.com (Oleg T.) schreibt:
>What is the most suitable Object Module Format for cross assemblers,
>compilers? It must be relocatable, machine independent, supported by
>most ICE vendors, with no limits regarding debugging process.


Object modules usually /are/ system dependent, starting with the
instruction set of a particular machine. You can use some virtual
machine code, like Java code, to support more than one specific
machine and OS.


DoDi
[Actually, in most modern object formats everything except for the
instruction set and the linker relocation types is
machine-independent. -John]

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.