Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions george.goffe@seagate.com (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions jimbo@radiks.net (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions joshualevy@yahoo.com (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions Ron@Profit-Master.com (Ron Pinkas) (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions plakal-nospam@nospam-cs.wisc.edu (Manoj Plakal) (2001-08-08) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions fmfab@chez.com (Fabrice Medio) (2001-08-15) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions gbs@k9haven.com (George B. Smith) (2001-08-24) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions erictetz@yahoo.com (Eric Tetz) (2001-09-03) |
From: | "George B. Smith" <gbs@k9haven.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Aug 2001 01:10:40 -0400 |
Organization: | k9haven.com |
References: | 01-07-166 01-08-009 |
Keywords: | interpreter |
Posted-Date: | 24 Aug 2001 01:10:38 EDT |
"Eric Tetz" <erictetz@yahoo.com> wrote:
> TCL, besides being large and slow, also happens to be a pretty crappy
> language IMHO. For details, including Richard Stallman's "Why you should not
> use Tcl", see:
>
> http://www.people.virginia.edu/~sdm7g/LangCrit/Tcl/
This is, IMO, a very cheap shot. The version of Tcl that RMS critqued
bears little resemblence to a modern Tcl, ie 8.3.3.3 or 8.4a3, in
terms of features and most especially performance. People who are
still pointing out this very dated argument from RMS are doing a
disservice to inquiring minds.
George B. Smith
gbs@k9haven.com
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.