Re: C++ Grammar

Gabriel Dos Reis <dosreis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
16 Aug 2001 23:48:03 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
C++ Grammar aarongray@beeb.net (Aaron Gray) (2001-08-06)
Re: C++ Grammar mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2001-08-08)
Re: C++ Grammar dosreis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2001-08-08)
Re: C++ Grammar mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2001-08-08)
Re: C++ Grammar aarongray@beeb.net (Aaron Gray) (2001-08-15)
Re: C++ Grammar dosreis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2001-08-15)
Re: C++ Grammar aarongray@beeb.net (Aaron Gray) (2001-08-15)
Re: C++ Grammar dosreis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2001-08-16)
Re: C++ Grammar iank@idiom.com (2001-08-17)
Re: C++ Grammar jerry@swsl.co.uk (Jerry Evans) (2001-08-17)
Re: C++ Grammar cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2001-08-17)
Re: C++ Grammar idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira D. Baxter) (2001-08-18)
Re: C++ Grammar clinton_olsen@yahoo.com (2001-08-18)
Re: C++ Grammar aarongray@beeb.net (Aaron Gray) (2001-08-20)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <dosreis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 Aug 2001 23:48:03 -0400
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
References: 01-08-037 01-08-064
Keywords: C++, parse
Posted-Date: 16 Aug 2001 23:48:03 EDT

"Aaron Gray" <aarongray@beeb.net> writes:


| Dear Reader,
| Looks like I asked a silly question ! GCC has it, a C++ YACC grammar
| there we go, okay. All I have to do now is get rid of the G++ bits and tidy
| it up.


I wish you good luck :-)


Please note that the grammar used in g++ is known to be incorrect and
cannot handle some cases correctly -- have a look at the section
"Known bugs" on GCC's web site. That is why CodeSourcery is
rewritting a new parser (a recursive descent one).


-- Gaby


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.