Re: Is C++ LL(k)?

isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (Isaac)
6 Aug 2001 04:07:13 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: Is C++ LL(k)? lingu@cs.pku.edu.cn (Lin Gu) (2001-07-23)
Re: Is C++ LL(k)? kaz@ashi.footprints.net (2001-07-27)
Re: Is C++ LL(k)? mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2001-07-27)
Re: Is C++ LL(k)? isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (2001-08-06)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (Isaac)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.compilers
Date: 6 Aug 2001 04:07:13 -0400
Organization: Road Runner - NC
References: <9jh5uu$olr$1@sunlight.pku.edu.cn> <mSZ67.20253$zb.360918@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com> 01-07-138
Keywords: C++, LL(1)
Posted-Date: 06 Aug 2001 04:07:13 EDT

On 23 Jul 2001 23:26:05 -0400, Lin Gu <lingu@cs.pku.edu.cn> wrote:


>However, I may have to use an LL(k) compiler generator (Antlr) to
>write a compiler for it. Is it difficult? It is expected that I need


It certainly is hard.
>to add some rules to disambiguate, but I want to know whether this is
>feasible.


The task is difficult enough that before anyone can answer whether it's
feasible, you'll need to assess just how badly you need to parse C++.
What are you planning to do?


Isaac

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.