Related articles |
---|
Looking for scripting suggestions ev@hysar.frmul.com (2001-07-30) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions erictetz@yahoo.com (Eric Tetz) (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions george.goffe@seagate.com (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions jimbo@radiks.net (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions joshualevy@yahoo.com (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions Ron@Profit-Master.com (Ron Pinkas) (2001-08-02) |
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions plakal-nospam@nospam-cs.wisc.edu (Manoj Plakal) (2001-08-08) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 2 Aug 2001 02:30:03 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 01-07-166 |
Keywords: | interpreter |
Posted-Date: | 02 Aug 2001 02:30:03 EDT |
Spam MeNot <ev@hysar.frmul.com> wrote:
> So basically, if you were developing an application that could load
> different control pages (think of a web browser that loads different
> web pages) and you wanted to be able to embed simple
> control/validation scripting into the pages, what would you consider
> using for a language?
Not sure about the page embedding aspect, but apart from that I'd go
for Rexx. Simple syntax, simple rules, built for pushing all "real
processing" into external calls. More information can be found on
http://www.rexxla.org/; the page to free interpreters can be found by
following the "Links" and "Free" links. (Just dug this up via Google,
I'm not affiliated with RexxLA.)
Regards,
Joachim
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.