Re: Looking for scripting suggestions

"Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
2 Aug 2001 02:30:03 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Looking for scripting suggestions ev@hysar.frmul.com (2001-07-30)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions erictetz@yahoo.com (Eric Tetz) (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions george.goffe@seagate.com (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions jimbo@radiks.net (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions joshualevy@yahoo.com (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions Ron@Profit-Master.com (Ron Pinkas) (2001-08-02)
Re: Looking for scripting suggestions plakal-nospam@nospam-cs.wisc.edu (Manoj Plakal) (2001-08-08)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 2 Aug 2001 02:30:03 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 01-07-166
Keywords: interpreter
Posted-Date: 02 Aug 2001 02:30:03 EDT

Spam MeNot <ev@hysar.frmul.com> wrote:
> So basically, if you were developing an application that could load
> different control pages (think of a web browser that loads different
> web pages) and you wanted to be able to embed simple
> control/validation scripting into the pages, what would you consider
> using for a language?


Not sure about the page embedding aspect, but apart from that I'd go
for Rexx. Simple syntax, simple rules, built for pushing all "real
processing" into external calls. More information can be found on
http://www.rexxla.org/; the page to free interpreters can be found by
following the "Links" and "Free" links. (Just dug this up via Google,
I'm not affiliated with RexxLA.)


Regards,
Joachim


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.