Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing

slimick@jcs.upb.pitt.edu (john slimick)
18 Jul 2001 20:00:34 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Generalized operator-precedence parsing joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-06-28)
Generalized operator-precedence parsing joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-07-06)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing gtoomey@usa.net (Gregory Toomey) (2001-07-17)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing David.Chase@naturalbridge.com (David Chase) (2001-07-17)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing dmitry@elros.cbb-automation.de (2001-07-17)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing peter@abbnm.com (2001-07-17)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing slimick@jcs.upb.pitt.edu (2001-07-18)
Re: Generalized operator-precedence parsing mickunas@cs.uiuc.edu (Dennis Mickunas) (2001-07-23)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: slimick@jcs.upb.pitt.edu (john slimick)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc
Date: 18 Jul 2001 20:00:34 -0400
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
References: 01-07-053 01-07-061
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 18 Jul 2001 20:00:34 EDT

On 17 Jul 2001 23:16:29 -0400, Gregory Toomey <gtoomey@usa.net> wrote:
>"Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de> wrote in message
>> Does anybody know about generalizations of operator-precedence parsing?
>> Any information (preferrably available on the Internet) would be
>> appreciated.


You might look for papers on extended operator precedence by Dr. Susan
Graham of Cal-Berkeley. In the late 60's -- early 70's she worked on
implementing one of the Wirth "enhanced" Algol's and, as I recall, to
continue the tradition of Dr. Wirth in using, in this case, a more
generalized operator precedence parsing.


john slimick
slimick@pitt.edu

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.