Re: Compilers QA

marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort)
6 Jul 2001 16:33:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compilers QA ori@grapesys.com (Ori Idan) (2001-07-03)
Re: Compilers QA marcov@toad.stack.nl (2001-07-06)
Re: Compilers QA tej@melbpc.org.au (Tim Josling) (2001-07-17)
Re: Compilers QA joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-07-18)
Re: Compilers QA ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-07-23)
Re: Compilers QA ppluzhnikov@earthlink.net (Paul Pluzhnikov) (2001-07-23)
Re: Compilers QA ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-07-23)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Jul 2001 16:33:10 -0400
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
References: 01-07-037
Keywords: testing
Posted-Date: 06 Jul 2001 16:33:10 EDT

In article 01-07-037, Ori Idan wrote:
> I have written a compiler for 8 bit processor (Motorola HC08) and I am now
> facing the problem of writing a Test plan and other QA documents for it.
> ... It seems as almost infinite number of combinations...
> How is is usually done in other comercial compilers?


1. There are usually validation suites for the langauge you implement.
Commercial ones, or otherwise.
2. Own validation suites created during implementation of the compiler

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.