Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug?

ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (Ralph Corderoy)
6 Jul 2001 16:28:46 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Is the dangling else a syntax bug? vbdis@aol.com (2001-06-28)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-07-02)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? lhp+news@toft-hp.dk (2001-07-03)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? vbdis@aol.com (2001-07-03)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-07-06)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2001-07-06)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? gsc@zip.com.au (Sean Case) (2001-07-06)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? lars@bearnip.com (2001-07-06)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? vbdis@aol.com (2001-07-17)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? dynagen@eircom.net (Barry Kelly) (2001-07-17)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2001-07-17)
Re: Is the dangling else a syntax bug? genew@shuswap.net (2001-07-17)
[14 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (Ralph Corderoy)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Jul 2001 16:28:46 -0400
Organization: InputPlus Ltd.
References: 01-07-020 01-07-041
Keywords: design, syntax
Posted-Date: 06 Jul 2001 16:28:46 EDT

Hi,


> Even in C you have statement (expression?) separators, which are
> distinct from statement terminators, and allow to write down multiple
> statements as a syntactically single statement: stmt1, stmt2, stmt3;
> I sometimes used that option to bypass the otherwise required block
> delimiters "{...}".


That's the comma operator. It's a sequence point, takes two operands
and return the value of its RHS. The operands aren't statements, e.g.
a while-loop isn't allowed, they're expressions.




Ralph.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.