|[7 earlier articles]|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org.OZ.AU (2001-04-12)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com (2001-04-12)|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org (felix) (2001-04-14)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com.OZ.AU (2001-04-14)|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org (Randall Hyde) (2001-04-14)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com (2001-04-15)|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org (Jim Granville) (2001-04-18)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-05-03)|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-05-07)|
|Re: C as assembly language Hans_Boehm@hp.com (Hans Boehm) (2001-05-07)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com (2001-05-13)|
|Re: C as assembly language firstname.lastname@example.org (David Thompson) (2001-05-15)|
|Re: C as assembly language email@example.com (2002-03-31)|
|From:||Jim Granville <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||18 Apr 2001 02:25:40 -0400|
|Organization:||Mandeno Granville elect|
|Posted-Date:||18 Apr 2001 02:25:40 EDT|
> Im Artikel 01-04-093, "Randall Hyde"
> <email@example.com> schreibt:
> >Guess it depends upon how you define "real" assembler.
> Right, I only had one point in mind, and forgot about all the other things,
> which an assembler is assumed to do :-(
> What I had in mind was, that an assembler is not normally allowed to insert
> instructions, modify the sequence of instructions, or the instructions
> themselves. At least this was the point of some hard core assembly programmers,
> which thought to know better how to write efficient code, and possibly also
> wrote self modifying code.
Yes, but does it HAVE to be this way ?
> In short, when someone says "do it exactly this way", then an assembler should
> do it that way. In all other cases the assembler can provide optimizations and
> address calculations, macros and other handy stuff.
We work a lot with PLD tools/compilers, and one attribute they have,
is control over KEEP / Collapse of logic nodes ( ie downstream LOGIC
minimise / optimise )
Sometimes in PLD code you want to say "don't fiddle with this at all!"
A similar option in Assemblers could benefit (all?) Assemblers, and
allow work on lower level optimise engines, as other threads have
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.