Related articles |
---|
legacy language to tcl elmerf@hughes.net (Elmer Fittery) (2001-04-14) |
Re: legacy language to tcl scott.gargash@vitesse.com (Scott Gargash) (2001-04-15) |
From: | Scott Gargash <scott.gargash@vitesse.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 15 Apr 2001 22:50:31 -0400 |
Organization: | Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation |
References: | 01-04-096 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 15 Apr 2001 22:50:31 EDT |
The following link defines the tcl syntax rules. It's a very simple
syntax.
http://dev.scriptics.com/man/tcl8.3.2/TclCmd/Tcl.htm
FWIW (and I don't know your legacy requirements), we've had lots of
success defining domain-specific languages using tcl syntax. The
benefit to doing this is that the parser becomes a matter of writing
tcl procs.
If you can tolerate some potential backwards incompatibility, it's
something to consider.
Scott
Elmer Fittery <elmerf@hughes.net> writes:
> I am considering using depot4 for translating a legacy language to tcl.
>
> Anybody know where I can get the EBNF notation for tcl? I tried
> www.scriptics.com with no luck.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.