Related articles |
---|
Thread-safety, lex and yacc. ndronen@io.frii.com (Nicholas Dronen) (2001-03-31) |
Re: Thread-safety, lex and yacc. olsenc@ichips.intel.com (2001-04-04) |
Re: Thread-safety, lex and yacc. troy@bell-labs.com (Troy Cauble) (2001-04-10) |
Re: Thread-safety, lex and yacc. clark@lextek.com (Clark) (2001-04-12) |
From: | olsenc@ichips.intel.com (Clint Olsen) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 Apr 2001 00:15:25 -0400 |
Organization: | Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR |
References: | 01-03-164 |
Keywords: | lex, yacc, parallel |
Posted-Date: | 04 Apr 2001 00:15:25 EDT |
You can use Lemon http://www.hwaci.com/sw/lemon for a reentrant LALR(1)
parser generator and re2c http://www.tildeslash.org/re2c/index.html for a
reentrant scanner. If you need more help with this, please feel free to
send me mail. I have these two working together in a parser tool.
I haven't been able to find a reentrant LL(1) parser generator, however.
-Clint
Nicholas Dronen wrote:
>Does anyone have experience with making an apparantly non-thread-safe
>lex/yacc code base thread-safe? Suggestions and pointers welcome.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.