Re: HLL expression -> ASM

"Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee@hotmail.com>
31 Mar 2001 02:34:06 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
HLL expression -> ASM alexfru@chat.ru (Alexei A. Frounze) (2001-03-26)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM danb2k@hotmail.com (Dan Bishop) (2001-03-27)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM dummy_addressee@hotmail.com (Alexei A. Frounze) (2001-03-31)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM titzer@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Ben L. Titzer) (2001-03-31)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM rhyde@transdimension.com (Randall Hyde) (2001-03-31)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2001-04-04)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM dummy_addressee@hotmail.com (Alexei A. Frounze) (2001-04-10)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM bill@megahits.com (Bill A.) (2001-04-10)
Re: HLL expression -> ASM henry@spsystems.net (2001-04-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:34:06 -0500
Organization: Global Crossing Telecommunications
References: 01-03-131 01-03-153
Keywords: code, assembler
Posted-Date: 31 Mar 2001 02:34:06 EST

I know that stack approach and I mentioned that I do want to use registers
instead of stack.
But there is one complication, I can assign registers arbitrary on x86
because (I)MUL and (I)DIV use (E)DX and (E)AX.


Good Luck
--
Alexei A. Frounze
alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
http://alexfru.chat.ru
http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
http://welcome.to/pmode/

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.