Related articles |
---|
Compiler Compiler Compiler danwang+news@cs.princeton.edu (Daniel C. Wang) (2001-03-22) |
Re: Compiler Compiler Compiler jjan@cs.rug.nl (J.H.Jongejan) (2001-03-26) |
Re: Compiler Compiler Compiler mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2001-03-26) |
Re: Compiler Compiler Compiler nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (2001-03-26) |
Re: compiler compiler compiler Dr_Feriozi@prodigy.net (2001-03-26) |
Re: Compiler Compiler Compiler kszabo@nortelnetworks.com (Kevin Szabo) (2001-03-27) |
Re: Compiler Compiler Compiler Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (Trevor Jenkins) (2001-03-27) |
[16 later articles] |
From: | "Daniel C. Wang" <danwang+news@cs.princeton.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 Mar 2001 01:13:49 -0500 |
Organization: | Princeton University |
Keywords: | tools, question |
Posted-Date: | 22 Mar 2001 01:13:48 EST |
Just curious, but has there been any research done on
parser-generators generators? i.e. some magic tool that will take a
specification of my favorite programming language and produce a yacc
like parser generator.
The first non-trivial thing anyone does when they invent a new
programming language seems to be rewriting yacc so they can bootstrap
their compiler. This sounds like a great master's thesis for
someone... :)
[Maybe I'm an old cynic, but that sounds to me like a way to appear busy
while delaying the start of the actual work. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.