Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language?

"Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
15 Feb 2001 00:37:36 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Microsoft Intermediate Language? dave@prim.demon.co.uk (David Griffiths) (2000-12-23)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? mike@dimmick.demon.co.uk (Mike Dimmick) (2000-12-24)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-12-24)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? vbdis@aol.com (2000-12-31)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-12-31)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? kaushik@ruksun.com (Kaushik Sridharan) (2001-01-05)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? maslen@pobox.com (Thomas Maslen) (2001-01-18)
Re: Microsoft Intermediate Language? joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2001-02-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Feb 2001 00:37:36 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 00-12-103 00-12-107 01-01-088
Keywords: design, UNCOL
Posted-Date: 15 Feb 2001 00:37:36 EST

Thomas Maslen <maslen@pobox.com> wrote:
> The devil may be in the details -- some of the languages had their
> semantics munged in the process, e.g. Eiffel# rather than Eiffel.


Actually the long-term goal is to do a full port of Eiffel. Eiffel# is
just the name of what they currently got implemented. (Whether that
full port will ever work is an entirely different question.)


Regards,
Joachim

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.