Java 2.0 Grammar Problems

"Michael Schoettner" <schoettner@informatik.uni-ulm.de>
12 Feb 2001 01:10:22 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Java 2.0 Grammar Problems schoettner@informatik.uni-ulm.de (Michael Schoettner) (2001-02-12)
Re: Java 2.0 Grammar Problems C.vanReeuwijk@twi.tudelft.nl (Kees van Reeuwijk) (2001-02-15)
Re: Java 2.0 Grammar Problems maslen@pobox.com (Thomas Maslen) (2001-02-17)
Re: Java 2.0 Grammar Problems C.vanReeuwijk@twi.tudelft.nl (Kees van Reeuwijk) (2001-02-23)
Re: Java 2.0 Grammar Problems pmb@dina.kvl.dk (Peter Bertelsen) (2001-02-25)
Re: Java 2.0 Grammar Problems Dr_Feriozi@prodigy.net (2001-03-01)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Michael Schoettner" <schoettner@informatik.uni-ulm.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Feb 2001 01:10:22 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: Java, parse, question
Posted-Date: 12 Feb 2001 01:10:22 EST

Hi all,


we are currently investigating the Java 2.0 grammer of the Java Language
Specification (second edition) for an own Java compiler. We are faced with
problems in some productions (an example is shown below). Does anybody have
experience with the Java 2.0 grammer? Alternative grammers in EBNF for Java
2.0 would also be an option. A short e-mail would be great. Many thanks in
advance for your efforts.




Best regards,


      Michael & Leon




Primary:
( Expression )
this [Arguments]
super SuperSuffix
Literal
new Creator
Identifier { . Identifier }[ IdentifierSuffix]
BasicType BracketsOpt .class (*)
void.class (**)


(*) + (**) What are these productions good for?




------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Schoettner
University of Ulm
Department of Distributed Systems
E-Mail: schoettner@informatik.uni-ulm.de
Web: http://www-vs.informatik.uni-ulm.de/Mitarbeiter/Schoettner/




Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.