Related articles |
---|
Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth ollanes@pobox.com (Orlando Llanes) (2000-11-05) |
Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth djg@argus.vki.bke.hu (Gabor DEAK JAHN) (2000-11-11) |
Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth gdemont@my-deja.com (2000-11-16) |
Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jerrold.leichter@smarts.com (Jerry Leichter) (2000-11-17) |
Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-11-19) |
Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jerrold.leichter@smarts.com (Jerry Leichter) (2000-11-21) |
Re: types, was New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-11-25) |
Re: types, was New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jerrold.leichter@smarts.com (Jerry Leichter) (2000-11-30) |
Re: types, was New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2000-12-01) |
Re: types, was New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jenglish@flightlab.com (2000-12-03) |
From: | "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim_d@gmx.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Nov 2000 01:08:50 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 00-11-046 00-11-082 00-11-120 00-11-122 00-11-133 00-11-141 |
Keywords: | types, arithmetic |
Posted-Date: | 25 Nov 2000 01:08:49 EST |
Just a minor point:
Jerry Leichter <jerrold.leichter@smarts.com> wrote:
> [...] and signed arithmetic is *not* modulo-2^k arithmetic.
Well, it is, in a sense (you have an offset of 2^(k-1), but that's not a
very strong difference).
You may be confusing this with C, where signed arithmetic overflow has
undefined behaviour (probably because modulo arithmetic for signed
integers was considered too unimportant and too variant to be a useful
part of the standard).
(Stuff that I agree with snipped.)
Regards,
Joachim
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.