Related articles |
---|
ProGrammar michel.bertin@cheval-freres.fr (Michel Bertin) (2000-11-07) |
Re: ProGrammar dforcier@allaire.com (Darren Forcier) (2000-11-22) |
From: | "Darren Forcier" <dforcier@allaire.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 Nov 2000 12:10:01 -0500 |
Organization: | Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com |
References: | 00-11-055 |
Keywords: | tools |
Posted-Date: | 22 Nov 2000 12:10:01 EST |
Michel,
I have worked with it extensively for over a year now. Prior to
working with Programmar I had limited exposure to compiler and parser
generator tools, and almost no theoretical background, just some
light-hearted hacking with Lex and Yacc.
I found Programmar's "Object Oriented" EBNF grammar language to be
extremely easy to work with, and the IDE to be an indispensible tool
when it came to debugging the grammars I was working with. I also
like the fact that the author worked in an ActiveX control wrapper
around the core parsing engine so I could import the typelib into
Delphi and work with it directly as that is the main language tool I
work in.
Highly recommended, especially for the "Finite Automata Theory"
challenged like myself :-)
Darren Forcier
Allaire Corporation
"Michel Bertin" <michel.bertin@cheval-freres.fr> wrote in message
> I have recently downloaded ProGrammar (http://www.programmar.com)
> Has someone already tested this product ?
> What is your opinion about it ?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.