From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 11 Nov 2000 10:10:15 -0500 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 00-11-069 |
Keywords: | syntax |
Posted-Date: | 11 Nov 2000 10:10:15 EST |
Chris F Clark <cfc@world.std.com> schreibt:
>All statements began with a keyword with the notable exception of
>"let" which was optional
IMO "Let" was not optional in the very first Basic implementations, it
acted as one of the legal begin-of-statement tokens. Later this
definition was relaxed, so that an identifier would definitely begin
an assignment statement.
DoDi
[That's correct, Dartmouth Basic required the LET. That's one of the
reasons the compiler was so fast -- the first token always told it what
kind of statement it was. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.