Related articles |
---|
Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states pcj1@my-deja.com (2000-11-09) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de (Hans-Bernhard Broeker) (2000-11-09) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states chrisd@reservoir.com (2000-11-09) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states pcj1@my-deja.com (2000-11-11) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-11-14) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-11-14) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states ucapjab@ucl.ac.uk (Jonathan Barker) (2000-11-14) |
Re: Theory about DFA's and f?lex start states frank@gnu.de (2000-11-14) |
[4 later articles] |
From: | Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 Nov 2000 16:49:55 -0500 |
Organization: | Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) |
References: | 00-11-073 |
Keywords: | lex, theory |
Posted-Date: | 09 Nov 2000 16:49:55 EST |
Originator: | broeker@ |
pcj1@my-deja.com wrote:
> My reason for posting however is to ask if people know of any research
> or investigation into the types of languages that are described by
> flex-like regular grammars (ie the combination of DFA's and STATES). Is
> there theory for this stuff or are multistate lexers just a pragmatic
> incremental improvement on DFA research?
I may be off by a mile, but AFAICS, start conditions don't really add
anything to the theory of DFA's. Actually, I have my doubts that start
conditions are even present as a feature in the DFA generated. They
just create additional DFA states and transitions, but don't modify
the way the DFA itself is represented.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de)
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.