Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators

Tom Moog <tmoog@polhode.com>
9 Nov 2000 12:05:51 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Philosophical question regarding statement terminators steve@brazzell.com (Steve Brazzell) (2000-11-07)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators tmoog@polhode.com (Tom Moog) (2000-11-09)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-11-09)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at (2000-11-09)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators vbdis@aol.com (2000-11-11)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators wclodius@aol.com (2000-11-14)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-11-14)
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators jerrold.leichter@smarts.com (Jerry Leichter) (2000-11-14)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tom Moog <tmoog@polhode.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 9 Nov 2000 12:05:51 -0500
Organization: Polhode Inc
References: 00-11-058
Keywords: design, syntax
Posted-Date: 09 Nov 2000 12:05:51 EST

The Praxis programming language (Greenwood et. al.) developed at
Lawrence Livermore used ";" when there was more than one statement on
a line. A statement could span a line without a continuation
character as long a the line break appeared in such a way that the
first token on the continuation line could not be the first token of a
statement or could not follow the last token of the preceding line.
It turned out that there were only one or two cases (very odd cases)
in the grammar that were disallowed.


Tom Moog
Polhode, Inc.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.