Related articles |
---|
Philosophical question regarding statement terminators steve@brazzell.com (Steve Brazzell) (2000-11-07) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators tmoog@polhode.com (Tom Moog) (2000-11-09) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-11-09) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at (2000-11-09) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators vbdis@aol.com (2000-11-11) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators wclodius@aol.com (2000-11-14) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-11-14) |
Re: Philosophical question regarding statement terminators jerrold.leichter@smarts.com (Jerry Leichter) (2000-11-14) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | Tom Moog <tmoog@polhode.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 9 Nov 2000 12:05:51 -0500 |
Organization: | Polhode Inc |
References: | 00-11-058 |
Keywords: | design, syntax |
Posted-Date: | 09 Nov 2000 12:05:51 EST |
The Praxis programming language (Greenwood et. al.) developed at
Lawrence Livermore used ";" when there was more than one statement on
a line. A statement could span a line without a continuation
character as long a the line break appeared in such a way that the
first token on the continuation line could not be the first token of a
statement or could not follow the last token of the preceding line.
It turned out that there were only one or two cases (very odd cases)
in the grammar that were disallowed.
Tom Moog
Polhode, Inc.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.