Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth webmaster@mkp.com (2000-10-31) |
| Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth smoleski@surakware.com (Sebastian Moleski) (2000-11-01) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth mikael@pobox.com (Mikael Lyngvig) (2000-11-04) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-11-05) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth ollanes@pobox.com (Orlando Llanes) (2000-11-05) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jsvendsen@bergen.frisurf.no (2000-11-07) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth jparis11@home.com (Jean Pariseau) (2000-11-07) |
| Re: Re: New Book: The School of Niklaus Wirth david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (David Thompson) (2000-11-11) |
| From: | jsvendsen@bergen.frisurf.no (jsvendsen) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 7 Nov 2000 13:06:48 -0500 |
| Organization: | Nextra Public Access |
| References: | 00-10-227 00-11-019 00-11-024 00-11-046 |
| Keywords: | design, OOP |
On 5 Nov 2000 20:53:01 -0500, Orlando Llanes <ollanes@pobox.com> wrote:
>they were not initialized). Also, why on Earth would anyone want
>multiple constructors or multiple destructors? Generally speaking,
To Initialize Objects With Different Basic Features. Can Be Moderately
Useful. Java Also Does This.
>Pascal is strict on type checking which does not allow for
>overloading. One more Pascal pet peeve, why is there no unsigned
>integer (one of my biggest pet peeves)?
In 16-Bit Turbo Pascal 7.0 The Unsigned Int Was Called Word.
In ObjPas I Have No Idea, But I Find It Strange That It Would Have Been
De-Implemented From The Language.
(After A Short Trip Into The Freepascal Documentation It Appears That
32bit Unsigned Ints Are Called "Cardinal" And 64bit "QWord")
jon svendsen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.