Re: Using C as a back end

christl@rosalind.fmi.uni-passau.de (Timon Christl)
5 Nov 2000 20:54:09 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[28 earlier articles]
Re: Using C as a back end vbdis@aol.com (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end thp@roam-thp2.cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end gneuner@dyn.com (2000-11-04)
Re: Using C as a back end fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-11-05)
Re: Using C as a back end freitag@alancoxonachip.com (Andi Kleen) (2000-11-05)
Re: Using C as a back end christl@rosalind.fmi.uni-passau.de (2000-11-05)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: christl@rosalind.fmi.uni-passau.de (Timon Christl)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 5 Nov 2000 20:54:09 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 00-10-148 00-10-164 00-10-205 00-10-234 00-11-016 00-11-028
Keywords: C

On 4 Nov 2000 01:41:25 -0500, Joachim Durchholz wrote
>3) There ain't no Real C Compilers anymore, if you compile C you
>always get the overhead for C++. (I don't know what that overhead
>would be though. Template instantiation seems to involve backtracking,
>but then most C++ programs don't instantiate that many templates.)


lcc is a "Real C Compiler". Just plain ANSI-C, without any C++ stuff.


--
Timon Christl <christl@fmi.uni-passau.de>

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.