Re: Using C as a back end

"Pred." <predictor@my-deja.com>
26 Oct 2000 02:44:51 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Using C as a back end sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end lazzaro@cs.berkeley.edu (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end predictor@my-deja.com (Pred.) (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end predictor@my-deja.com (Pred.) (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end sweeks@my-deja.com (Stephen T. Weeks) (2000-10-23)
Re: Using C as a back end jaidi@fos.ubd.edu.bn (Pg Nor Jaidi Pg Tuah) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end predictor@my-deja.com (Pred.) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end ONeillCJ@logica.com (Conor O'Neill) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end kst@cts.com (Keith Thompson) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacob navia) (2000-10-26)
Re: Using C as a back end nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end sweeks@my-deja.com (Stephen T. Weeks) (2000-10-31)
Re: Using C as a back end zs@ender.cs.mu.oz.au (2000-10-31)
[15 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Pred." <predictor@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Oct 2000 02:44:51 -0400
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
References: 00-10-148 00-10-152 00-10-183
Keywords: C, translator

>>Finally, I'd recommend striving to generate pure ANSI
>>C by default,
>>and only do non-portable things under flag control -- it
>>will reduce the amount of email in your mbox :-).


Indeed, I was thinking about using lcc as the back end. While it's not
yet an optimizing compiler, it seems to be very portable. Any thoughts
on this choice?


--
Thanks,
- Pred.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.