Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be called parz@RemoveThisSpamBucket.home.com (Parzival) (2000-10-22) |
| Re: What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be ca parz@RemoveThisSpamBucket.home.com (Parzival) (2000-10-23) |
| Re: What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be ca johan.boule@online.fr (Johan Boulé) (2000-10-23) |
| Re: What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be ca vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-23) |
| Re: What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be ca vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-26) |
| Re: What would a compiler interpreter that executes machine code be ca support@quartus.net (Neal Bridges) (2000-11-07) |
| From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 23 Oct 2000 22:17:39 -0400 |
| Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
| References: | 00-10-155 |
| Keywords: | practice |
"Parzival" <parz@RemoveThisSpamBucket.home.com> schreibt:
>So, what term would distinguish a Perl or
>Python type program from one which which combines native code
>generation with immediate execution?
>[I'd suggest "compile and go", that's what we always used to call it. -John]
Another TLA herefore is JIT, where a Just-In-Time compiler creates
native code just when execution is required.
But what about Forth? Forth can produce native code, which executes
whenever the assembled/compiled Word is invoked. That's more a
"compile to go"...
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.