UNCOL = Uncool?

"SRS" <sskaflot@online.no>
19 Oct 2000 14:31:43 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
UNCOL = Uncool? sskaflot@online.no (SRS) (2000-10-19)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? danwang+news@cs.princeton.edu (Daniel C. Wang) (2000-10-22)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-22)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? peteg@cse.unsw.edu.au (Peter Gammie) (2000-10-23)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-10-23)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? danwang+news@cs.princeton.edu (Daniel C. Wang) (2000-10-23)
Re: UNCOL = Uncool? cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-10-23)
[7 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "SRS" <sskaflot@online.no>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Oct 2000 14:31:43 -0400
Organization: Nextra Public Access
Keywords: UNCOL, question

Has there been any research on UNCOL and related technolgies lately?
The Microsoft initiative on the IR domain (.NET) seems interesting,
but I'm sure there will be absolutely no strategy to provide this
technology on non-Windows platforms.


Thanks in advance!
[Given the uniform failure of all previous UNCOL attempts, I'd be pretty
sceptical. I agree it's possible if you limit the source languages and
targets enough, but then it's usually not very interesting, either. -John]






Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.