Re: Dragon Book - update necessary?

LLkParsing@aol.com
12 Oct 2000 22:23:53 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Dragon Book - update necessary? predictor@my-deja.com (Pred.) (2000-10-08)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-10-10)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? ian@nomadix.demon.co.uk (Ian Elliott) (2000-10-10)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? Bjorn.DeSutter@rug.ac.be (Bjorn De Sutter) (2000-10-10)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (2000-10-12)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? LLkParsing@aol.com (2000-10-12)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? gelleric@wgelleri.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (2000-10-12)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-10-15)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? bruce@hoult.org (Bruce Hoult) (2000-10-19)
Re: parsing C++, was Dragon Book - update necessary? lex@cc.gatech.edu (2000-10-22)
Re: Dragon Book - update necessary? rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-10-23)
Re: parsing tools, was Dragon Book - update necessary? LLkParsing@aol.com (2000-10-26)
[8 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: LLkParsing@aol.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Oct 2000 22:23:53 -0400
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
References: 00-10-061 00-10-067
Keywords: books

> For undergraduate work the only complaint I've had with this book is
> that it's very wordy.


Wordy is a charitable description of the book's readability. On the
other end of the scale is the also old, but still good "Crafting a
Compiler with C" by Fischer & LeBlanc. Dragon does make an excellent
reference though.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.