Re: Pre-Parsers

jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at (Jonathan Thornburg)
12 Oct 2000 22:22:50 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Pre-Parsers vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-13)
Re: Pre-Parsers saroj@bear.com (2000-09-15)
Re: Pre-Parsers vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-21)
Re: Pre-Parsers broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de (Hans-Bernhard Broeker) (2000-10-08)
Re: Pre-Parsers fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-10-10)
Re: Pre-Parsers brynjulv.hauksson@sds.no (2000-10-12)
Re: Pre-Parsers jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at (2000-10-12)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at (Jonathan Thornburg)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Oct 2000 22:22:50 -0400
Organization: Universitaet Wien (Vienna, Austria) / Institut fuer Theoretische Physik
References: 00-09-119 00-09-155 00-10-044 00-10-076
Summary: why C preprocessor can't properly grok sizeof()
Keywords: practice, C

Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
[[various historical reasons why the C preprocessor doesn't grok sizeof()]]


The fundamental problem with putting sizeof() into the C preprocessor
is simply that sizeof() respects scope, and the preprocessor doesn't.
I suspect it would very tricky to define how sizeof() should work to
properly respect scope (which it must to be of any use), and still keep
the preprocessor semantics (historically completely unscoped) reasonably
sane and backwards-compatible.


--
-- Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn@thp.univie.ac.at>
      http://www.thp.univie.ac.at/~jthorn/home.html
      Universitaet Wien (Vienna, Austria) / Institut fuer Theoretische Physik


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.