Re: Event based language, does it exist?

Atle <trollet@skynet.be>
8 Oct 2000 22:30:54 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[18 earlier articles]
Re: Event based language, does it exist? mwh@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (2000-09-08)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (Martin von Loewis) (2000-09-08)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? Norman_member@newsguy.com (Norman Culver) (2000-09-08)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? cbbrowne@acm.org (2000-09-15)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? henter@wxs.nl (Peter Stevens) (2000-09-21)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2000-09-21)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? trollet@skynet.be (Atle) (2000-10-08)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? rog@vitanuova.com (2000-10-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Atle <trollet@skynet.be>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc
Date: 8 Oct 2000 22:30:54 -0400
Organization: Belgacom Skynet SA/NV
References: 00-08-132 00-09-004 00-09-059 00-09-145
Keywords: design, parallel

Peter Stevens wrote:
>
> timers, expire them etc.. The processes had states in which they could
> receive certain messages. If the message was not expected, it was
> discarded, unless you were in a substate. Basically, it did all the
> things an event driven language should do.


Now it is starting to look a little like CSP.


I am considering taking it up for specifying an OS ... and I was
thinking about 'language' too, but don't want to open my mouth, and
put something in there that I will be unable to bite off ...
--
Best wishes, Atle
users.skynet.be/atle

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.